Blender
Website: Blender.org
Blender is a free, open source software 32-bit 3D modelling, animation, rendering, post-production, and gaming program. Initially developed by Ton Roosendaal's company NaN in the Netherlands, its popularity, and capabilities, have grown over the years. There is a large and active user base with ongoing development by dedicated hackers, making Blender a powerful and viable 3D software solution.
It can be used for modelling, UV unwrapping, texturing, rigging, skinning, animating, rendering, particle and other simulating, non-linear editing, compositing, and creating interactive 3D applications.
Blender has a robust feature set similar in scope and depth to other high-end 3D software such as Softimage|XSI, Cinema 4D, 3ds Max and Maya. These features include advanced simulation tools such as rigid body, fluid, and soft body dynamics, modifier based modelling tools, powerful character animation tools, a node based material and compositing system and Python for embedded scripting.
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
42.80
-
45.23
-
45.56
-
50.36
-
50.86
-
55.99
-
56.68
-
60.18
-
61.29
-
64.61
-
67.13
-
69.90
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
85.11
-
89.46
-
89.92
-
100.20
-
100.33
-
111.21
-
111.21
-
119.89
-
124.58
-
133.63
-
138.19
-
143.69
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
The Blender scores tank, quite frankly. The older Athlon 64 X2s work faster, especially in the single-core test, as they have the clock speed advantage. However, even the 2.4GHz Intel Q6600 is nearly 17 percent faster than a 2.4GHz Phenom 9700. In the SMP test, Phenom performance is slightly better, but not by much.
Maxon Cinebench 10 x64
Website: Cinebench
Maxon Cinebench is based on Maxon's popular animation software, Cinema 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. We've used the built-in CPU benchmark, which uses a 3D scene file to render a photo-realistic image of a concept bike. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders.
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
13309
-
12150
-
10855
-
10513
-
9932
-
9669
-
9247
-
9061
-
6648
-
5929
-
5877
-
5344
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
15000
Score
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (4x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6400+ (2x3.20GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.00GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Phenom 9900 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9700 (4x2.4GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9600 ES (4x2.3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Phenom 9500 ES (4x2.2GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
3743
-
3526
-
3506
-
3118
-
3095
-
3037
-
2825
-
2802
-
2718
-
2475
-
2450
-
2317
Score
Again, single-core performance is pitiful as the low clocked Phenoms can barely keep pace with the rest of the field. However, multi-core performance is far better and the overall performance is within a whisker of a similarly clocked Intel alternative.
Want to comment? Please log in.